Will Rogers was wrong. The legendary humorist, speaking of the responsibilities each of us has as a citizen of this nation, once observed, "America is a great country, but you can't live in it for nothing." Unless, it turns out, you're Eduardo Saverin, the 30-year-old co-founder of Facebook, who just before that company launched its initial public offering, which would make him a multibillionaire, renounced his American citizenship and moved to Singapore.
To be fair, according to Tom Goodman, Saverin's New York-based spokesperson, "Eduardo recently found it to be more practical to become a resident of Singapore since he plans to live there for an indefinite period of time." That is, take your choice, bull, baloney or bunkum.
Today's capital gains tax rate in the United States — which is one-half of what it was when conservative Icon Ronald Reagan was president — is just 15 percent. But compared to Singapore's zero capital gains tax rate, it must look irresistible to those who put profits over patriotism.
Some conservatives who seem to hate taxes more than they love America even praise expatriate Saverin for renouncing his U.S. citizenship. Forbes' John Tamny, who covers "the intersection of economics and politics," writes that "wise minds could very credibly proclaim him (Saverin) an American hero for doing what he did."
Let us review the story up to now. Fleeing kidnapping threats against his wealthy family, Eduardo Saverin, at the age of 13, came to the United States from Brazil, his country of birth. He became a U.S. citizen and graduated magna cum laude from Harvard, where he met the two other co-founders of Facebook.
Among the rights the United States provided to her adopted son Eduardo Saverin was security from personal danger, the freedom to become whatever his talents and hard work would permit him to be, copyright and patent laws to protect his invention and a court system to guarantee those protections.
You can call Saverin a genius, an extraordinary entrepreneur and a capitalist success.
What you cannot call Saverin is a patriot. Ungrateful to the country that gave him safe harbor and a new life, Saverin put a price tag on patriotism and, rather than pay the taxes dues on his unfathomable fortune, chose to get himself a change-of-address card for Singapore.
This is the thanks he gives to the people and their government that welcomed him and guaranteed that the air he would breathe and the water he would drink were clean, that the food he ate and medicine he took were healthful, and that he and his family were protected by the world's best military.
It is beyond kind to call someone who greedily grabs all that his new U.S. citizenship gives him and then refuses to give back what he owes a freeloader. No, this loathsome behavior is instead parasitic.
Fifty years ago, a young American president told the world that "to assure the survival and the success of liberty," he and his fellow countrymen "will pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship." Today, for Eduardo Saverin and his apologists in the tax-avoidance club, to be a citizen is all about your rights and nothing about your responsibilities. And if you don't like any law, you can just do what to the rest of us is truly unimaginable — and renounce your American citizenship.
To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
Froma was making this same point the other day. Sounds like that Warren lady who portrays herself an Amerind and thinks anybody who succeeds did so exploiting the system. Wise leftists talk of the global economy, and this guy is a product of that. He is just a global citizen. Be careful what you wish for, right? Anyway, the government will waste a million dollars every second whether or not this guy is paying in.
Liberals are mad because they won't get their hands on enough of this guys money. That sense of entitlement rings clearly through both of these aticles.
Greed takes many forms.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Tom
Fri May 18, 2012 10:55 AM
Re: Tom: This "guy" enlisted in the U.S. Marines to serve his country and put his life on the line. My guess is you have never done anything like that in your little life, and have no idea what the word "patriot" really means.
You have totally missed his point, as do all of you think-easy tea-partiers. Lawyers have a saying, "the law is what's boldly proposed and forcefully argued. You idiots try to apply that to science and reality, and that is why you fail.
Don't try to talk yourself into jumping off of any bridges, thinking you can fly, buddy. You won't like the result. Actually, comet to think of it, you won't be able to like or dislike the result.
I didn't miss the point, Shields is chastising the guy for availing himself of all America has to offer and is now jumping ship just as his is coming in. Shield says "What you cannot call Saverin is a patriot. Ungrateful to the country that gave him safe harbor and a new life, Saverin put a price tag on patriotism and, rather than pay the taxes dues on his unfathomable fortune, chose to get himself a change-of-address card for Singapore" I didn't miss the point.
It is clear that I am not angry with the young man because this sort of thing will happen in a global economy; when taxes get a little high in one nation companies and citizens will mobilize into other situations. Does this truth hurt so much that lashing out is required at my agreeable and innocent post? Control your rage, people. You are yelling.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Tom
Sat May 19, 2012 3:39 AM
I've been all over the web and can't find Eduardo Saverin in the Marines. Did you miss the point or reply to the wrong article? Are you lying, or just a numbskull? None of his biographies mention the Marines. Enlighten us, oh great oracle of patiotism and platform diving. Are you just making things up? Don't you know your facts? Shouldn't you strive to be well informed before attacking other people? Now I'm going to spend the rest of my life thinking Liberals are ill-informed liars. It will be all your fault, I hope you are proud of yourself.
Kids.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Tom
Sat May 19, 2012 4:44 AM
Mark, Leona Helmsley has nothing to do with my position. If a car is cheaper down the road people will make the trip to purchase it. That is what I am saying. Perhaps you have other reasons for not understanding me, but don't put words in my mouth. Ah, but you are a fact man, so here are some:
Actual IRS figures for 2008, the last year complete figures are available for:
Top 10% (Income Split Point $113,799) Paid 69.94% of Federal Individual Income Taxes
Top 25% (Income Split Point $67,280) Paid 86.34% of Federal Individual Income Taxes
Top 50% (Income Split Point $33,048) Paid 97.30% of Federal Individual Income Taxes
Bottom 50% (Anyone Making Less Than $33,048) Paid 2.7% of Federal Individual Income Taxes
Kinda blows the lid off of Obama's (and your) class warfare shell game.
Leona Helmsley? Really? How...quaint. Reagan era stuff from the last century. Probably the last time you reassessed your point of view.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Tom
Sat May 19, 2012 5:34 AM
Re: Mark... Taxes are for little people... So is prison and the defense of liberty... Not paying taxes and attacking liberty are what the Big People do... So what??? We all sacrifice for every relationship we will ever have, and not all of them will be equal, and though we think of political equality as a given, it cannot exist in the face of economic inequality... They don't want the sacrifice... They don't get the relationship...Mr. Saverin made fact was is really obvious... Wolves have no relationship with the deer... Lions have no relationship with the lamb...A relationship that ends in the destruction of one is not a relationship, but an incident in the existence of one... People must appoint themselves to the position of exploiter... As Jefferson said: People are not born with saddles on their back; nor are those who choose to ride them born with whips and spurs... It is a choice people make to use one another, to sail on rivers of blood to the destination of their dreams, to convert our liberty into their mastery of us... Certainly, we should not judge what our constitution allows...Bullllll shet... A constitution exists as a relationship among people before it is ever framed on paper... Our written constitution is unconstitutional in that it is destructive of our national relationship...Mr. Saverin only did what his whole class has done as a matter of course... He like they, have denied the relationship between us as fundamental to the survival of each of us, and have put their own survival and well being above our own...Let them go... Let them all go... We owe them nothing that they have not already taken for themselves, and more...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #7
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat May 19, 2012 8:12 AM
Mr. Shields...Mr. Saverin has made no secret of his treason, and for that fact he should at least be spared... Better an enemy without, who makes no secret of his disdain for our social obligations, than one who seeks our demise as a nation, by acting against so many disjointed and antagonistic individuals...These men are job creators... What is that, that we cannot do ourselves better without them continually shipping our jobs abroad???..
Aristotle did not put words in the mouths of these traitors to liberty when he repeated the Oligarchic Oath: I Will Be an Enemy of the People!!!... Rather, Aristotle took the words out of the mouth of our entire employing class, our bankers, our capitalist class...To make a law for them is to create an impediment for them to circumvent... Among the justices and the law makers, no thought of justice is remembered...That Jus is the Genus, and Lex a species of it is babble from centuries past... They want those who carry the whole society to make extra effort to carry the government which is the support of their exploiters...
You said it yourself: We have to make something... We cannot be only a service society surviving by doing each others wash...When these people invest abroad, and ship our capital and industry abroad they are taking what they have stolen from us, and are putting it in the hands of people with no reason to be our friends... They are so many traitors with not a single patriot between them... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #8
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat May 19, 2012 8:32 AM
Re: Tom... Do you really expect those who have nothing,m and have nothing because their government has never made an issue of justice in this land, to pay for the privilage of dishonorable poverty??? Do you think they do not pay dearly in taxes everytime they buy necessities???...The burden of excise tax always falls on those least able to pay...What you can easily pay is hardly a burden, and that is, for the rich all they are required to pay... If people had to pay for what they get, then the rich are getting it all for free... The less than rich pay for an inequality of rights that makes those with privilage more than equal in every respect than them...
Property rights may seem a small thing if you can enjoy them, but if you do not have them because you have no property you find yourself outmatched, without the protection law gives to the privilage of property that those without property must pay for... A man may feel secure in his estate and effects from illegal search and seizure, but if one has no estate he can expect no protection from law...And what is the cost of that protection??? Violence does not determine who rots in prison, but property, since the majority of those under arrest by the state are there for crimes against property...And why should they not take- as is taken from them quite legally, since to possess property is to possess honor, and to be without property is to own dishonor...
We say work is worth while... When will it be worth a living wage??? It is impossible to teach the value of work to people who know it does not pay anything...So; with all due respect: Shove your class warfare, nonsense... There is a war going on... But it has never been us against them, because we tend to honor and admire them... The war is them against us, and against our liberties, and they make the charge to keep us helpless in our own defense...
The difference between us is slight... They simply have all the rights we have and more, but that little bit of more rights makes more and more inroads against all our rights and actually undercuts their privilage, since we all have our limit... Our rights are our bread and butter... If we do not have rights we do not even eat, and it is only in having many and good rights enforced by government that we will ever eat well... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #9
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat May 19, 2012 8:58 AM
"Do you really expect those who have nothing,m and have nothing because their government has never made an issue of justice in this land, to pay for the privilage of dishonorable poverty?"
Thanks..Sweeney if I don't try to make my way through another labyrinthian post by you. The first sentence was enough for me, if you can't form a coherent sentence you probably con't form a coherent thought. I know you are a moralist and God speaks to Sweeney, but I just don't care because os Senator Welch said: Have you no shame? It was once the right that deserved that, back in the 1950's . Now it is the left, who cover up the truth and echo lies and half truths. Sorry, lecture someone who believes you the great moralist of our age.
Comment: #10
Posted by: Tom
Sat May 19, 2012 3:59 PM
Re: Tom...What nonsense... You are known by the company you keep, and you are what you eat; which in your case makes you a toob steak, and in my case makes me well...With my income bracket, I could actually have some money in my pocket if I could give up eating... Think of how wealthy Mr. Shields would be...Could probably take all that loot and buy a couple more years of flavorless life... Seriously; Consider what that oriental asked: Why should I make my stomach into a graveyard for animals??? Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #12
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sun May 20, 2012 5:51 AM
Re: Tom;... God does not talk to me... Not all of us need to be talked at to get the message... I do get a laugh out of Jesus... What a world we would have if you gave your pants too, to those who bring suit for your shirt...He is right... The answer is not a frontal attack against force... If the Romans demand a mile of you, as was their right, to carry their crap, then offer them another... To change the world we must first change our minds... What is the essential change we would make, and what changes are inessential??? You see; Jesus was attacking the formality of his religion that had really become an institutionalized means to wealth for the priests and their hangers on... He was talking of a psychological relationship with God, a God that did not care about the motions we make of formal attendance to the law, but knew the moment of sin was in the moment of desire...He messed with the power structure of his day with this notion of a relationship with God sans priests... He attacked formality- empty of relationship...
Okay... This time is not so different from that... We have this nation, but the word and the thing is meaningless... People pledge alliegience to that one nation with liberty and justice for all, but hate their neighbor and deny him justice...The form has been drained of its meaning, and Jesus saw that was true in his day, just as many of the prophets did... People we sueing each other for their tunics which they would pledge to another to have breakfast for their families, and if they did not find work and wages; gone was their shirt...That is how poor and desparate were the people...But, when the Romans took Jeruselem, there was so much loot left over that they built the Colloseum, which was an huge building project, all from one dirty little city... They were trading in gold, changing money on the steps of their temple with the whole society mired in poverty...Their religion like our religion and our government had become just another racket...So; I do pay attention to Jesus, and the Prophets, And If you can read them, and not think they might be talking to this age, and to this people in this new promised land, then I think you must be nuts...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #13
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sun May 20, 2012 6:17 AM
I think Saverin has probably outsmarted himself. He should acquaint himself with the way countries like China, Russia the Ukraine and other oligarchies treat wealthy capitalists. Mr. Saverin may not have his money (or even his freedom) very long.
Posted by: Baby Nudge
Sunday May 20, 2012
Comment: #14
Posted by: VP Whitehill
Sun May 20, 2012 9:04 AM
Tom, sorry, I owe you an apology. By "this guy" I meant Mark Shields, not Saverin. I didn't read your comment carefully. I have to laugh at the thought of the delicate Saverin ever serving in the military...
However, I still resent your persistent attempts to trivialize these issues by basking in that epithet "liberal" like a dog rolling around in you know what. You did indeed aim that trite accusation at Mark, who invested his life in his patriotism more than you can ever dream of doing. You are better than that, and of course so is he by orders of magnitude.
He can be a "liberal" or whatever else he wishes to call himself, and that makes no difference in the legitimacy of his point or the degree to which those who have much to learn like you should listen and educate yourselves.
Comment: #15
Posted by: Masako
Sun May 20, 2012 7:04 PM
Re: VP Whitehill;... It is not his money, and it is not his freedom... Freedom is not a quality of people, but of societies... For anyone to enjoy freedom, the whole society must have it, and be able to defend it...And, all wealth and all property is part of the commonwealth... While I would agree that there may well be found instances where some of the commonwealth should be allowed into private hands, that the object of democracy is not only defense of freedom, but of general welfare, prosperity for the whole people as our right, -Which requires that wealth and estates be taxed rather than becoming hereditary, which did not work for the people in regard to government, and does not work in regard to wealth... Let people have their reward for creating value, and doing a public service, and this goes as well for every working person; but keep the commonwealth as a prize for everyone, so that everyone can cut their own existence out of it, and leave it again for future generations...
People do not defend nothing... When the freedom of the Romans meant only poverty with the threat of slavery, men would cut off their thumbs rather than enlist in the military; even with the barbarians at the gate... We all need something of what Mr. Savarin took with him- that he took out of us, and out of our commonwealth... The rich want our wealth to be portable, and liquid so they can easier make off with it... There is a cure for that...The rich want to privatize the entire commonwealth, and make it their own for all time... The cure for that is one of long duration... As the number of poor are multiplied many times by the number of rich, the price of supporting all those denied the ability to support themselves increases... If the rich will not pay taxes they must surrender the commonwealth...Before they do this they will make war on the people; but to have the commonwealth they practiced the art of class warfare; so war is nothing new...
The fact we cannot escape is that economic inequality destroys political equality, and puts democracy, morality and justice beyond our reach... Poor people inevitably sell their rights for their survival, and in the end have neither... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #16
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Mon May 21, 2012 5:23 AM
Re: Masako;... To be free is to be a liberal... One can only enjoy as much freedom as one allows...That freedom we would at once take for ourselves and deny to others is not liberty, but licence...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #17
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Mon May 21, 2012 5:28 AM