creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Daily Editorials
22 May 2012
Save $2 Billion. Close the U.S. Capitol Until November.

Here's a modest proposal: Since it has become blindingly obvious that the United States Congress won't get … Read More.

22 May 2012
Golden Geese Fly Away

Rich people are starting to flee America for tax havens elsewhere. It's not as bad as refugees getting out of … Read More.

21 May 2012
Gasoline Price Gouging, By Government

With gasoline in this region persisting at $4 and up, the inevitable complaint is raised that motorists are … Read More.

Unshackling The Press, Empowering The People

Share Comment

What does the federal government have that's missing from 49 states?

Fear.

Fear of protecting journalists from being forced to reveal their sources, to be specific. Fear of public access to matters of public interest, to be brutally broad.

The aptly named Free Flow of Information Act, passed overwhelmingly by the House and expected to be voted on by the Senate this week, addresses a problem that has been dealt with rather handily by the states but persists at the federal level.

The bill would provide a "shield" to journalists who are now subject to pressure from prosecutors and judges to disclose the identities of anonymous sources.

More than 40 journalists in recent years have been subpoenaed, questioned, held in contempt of court and even jailed over their pledges of confidentiality to sources, notes Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., a champion of H.R. 2102. The implications are far from comforting when one considers, not the plight of the reporter, but the plain fact that many of the most important exposes of high-level wrongdoing — Watergate, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Enron — depended on information from persons who dared not or simply would not go public.

Stifling that process would not just inconvenience an industry; it would weaken democracy, for which facts are oxygen.

At the same time, it is not as though the measure gives carte blanche to irresponsible or nefarious snoops whose revelations or secrecy might endanger national security or otherwise do harm. The bill provides for judicial review on a case-by-case basis as to when and whether the shield can come down.

While the administration and some senators insist that the qualified shield law as proposed is not qualified enough, it is noteworthy that the two chief architects, Pence and Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., are both conservatives with impeccable national security credentials and keen awareness that this is wartime. Conservatives, Pence and Lugar point out, also believe in limited government and the essential role of a free press.

So do 41 state attorneys general. They've petitioned Congress and President George W. Bush to enact the Free Flow of Information Act, which Bush has threatened to veto. These leaders in law enforcement could assure the president, if media organizations could not, that experience does not substantiate fear of free exercise of the First Amendment, unless that fear is a selfish one about letting go of power.

REPRINTED FROM THE INDIANAPOLIS STAR.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Newspaper Contributors
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 23 May 2012
Dennis Prager
Dennis PragerUpdated 22 May 2012

25 Mar 2011 Put Reform Back in Prison Bill

9 Dec 2009 Obama's Jobs, Emissions Pledges Clash

16 Jan 2009 Expand SCHIP to Cover Children