creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Connie Schultz icon
Connie Schultz
16 May 2012
Dear Young Mothers: Ignore Time Magazine

In February 1989, I ended a phone interview for a magazine story I was writing and looked up to find my 21-month-… Read More.

9 May 2012
Finally, the President Says 'I Do'

This was going to be a different kind of column. My friend Jackie, through a mutual contact, arranged for me … Read More.

2 May 2012
Go, Rachel, Go

In the early '90s, I was visiting a girls school, when I spotted two third-graders engaged in a heated … Read More.

Komen Caves, Women Pay

Share Comment

The Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation has severed its ties with Planned Parenthood.

As a result, hundreds of thousands of dollars — nearly $700,000 last year alone — no longer will fund breast cancer screenings and other breast-related services for low-income and uninsured women at 19 Planned Parenthood affiliates across the country.

Poof! Gone.

Komen made the decision in December, but the news didn't get out until this week. Before Komen went into lockdown mode, a spokeswoman told The Associated Press that this decision had nothing to do with the relentless pressure from anti-abortion groups that want to drive Planned Parenthood into extinction.

So why did an extremist anti-abortion group brag online about the funding cuts two weeks before Komen told Planned Parenthood?

On Dec. 2, 2011, Doug Scott, president of Life Decisions International, announced on its Facebook page that Komen was off its boycott list because it no longer was funding Planned Parenthood.

"Please keep in mind that if the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation deserved to be included in The Boycott List, it would still be there," he wrote. "There is reason to celebrate. Just do not do it too loudly."

That post has since evaporated.

Poof! Gone.

When I asked Scott how he had found out about the cuts, he hesitated and then started to laugh. "I probably shouldn't comment on that, actually. It's probably best if I say nothing."

When I asked whether he'd heard it from the Susan G. Komen foundation, he laughed again.

"Might be true we heard it from Susan G. Komen. Might not be true. Maybe I heard it from an organization affiliated with Komen. Or maybe I heard it from an organization affiliated with an organization affiliated with Komen." More laughter. "How's that for confusing?"

On Dec. 16, Komen President Elizabeth Thompson finally told Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards that their relationship was over. Rules are rules, she said, and Komen's had changed to prohibit funding for organizations under government investigation.

This is how easy it is to trigger that new rule: Last September, a single member of Congress — in this instance, anti-choice Republican Rep. Cliff Stearns — called for an audit of Planned Parenthood, which has long been a target of conservatives.

Komen threw up its collective hands and claimed it had no choice but to abandon thousands of women who depend on Planned Parenthood affiliates for breast cancer screenings.

Curiously, only months earlier, in June 2011, Komen posted on its website a statement in support of Planned Parenthood: "During the past five years, Komen Affiliate grants to Planned Parenthood have funded 139,000 clinical breast exams and nearly 5,000 mammograms, enabling the detection of 177 breast cancers. ... As long as there is a need for health care for vulnerable populations, Komen will fund the facilities that can best meet those needs."

That statement recently evaporated from Komen's website.

Poof! Gone.

There are a lot of questions I would have asked the Komen foundation, had it responded to my numerous requests.

I'm wondering about those disappearing website posts. I'm also curious about the influence of Komen's new senior vice president, Karen Handel. During Handel's 2010 unsuccessful bid for governor of Georgia, she made clear that she was anti-choice and anti-Planned Parenthood. She vowed to strip PP affiliates of any funding for women's services. She lost and joined Komen last April.

As of Wednesday evening, the only new information I could get from the Komen foundation was posted on its Facebook page. The site moderators took a break from deleting negative comments to post a statement meant to address the avalanche of criticism from disappointed donors and to chastise Planned Parenthood, which had the gall to start raising money for a breast cancer fund.

"Grant making decisions are not about politics — our priority is and always will be the women we serve. Making this issue political or leveraging it for fundraising purposes would be a disservice to women."

That apparently was meant to be a serious statement.

Breast cancer always has been a political issue because it is overwhelmingly a woman's disease. It took decades of lobbying — by breast cancer survivors and advocates — to get crucial funding for research and treatment. We still are waiting for a cure.

For at least the past six years, the Susan G. Komen foundation and Planned Parenthood have been partnering giants in this fight for women's health.

Now Komen has let the relentless war on women derail this mighty force for justice.

Just like that: Poof! Gone.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and an essayist for Parade magazine. She is the author of two books, including "...and His Lovely Wife," which chronicled the successful race of her husband, Sherrod Brown, for the U.S. Senate. To find out more about Connie Schultz (con.schultz@yahoo.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM


Comments

17 Comments | Post Comment
so let me get this right, we have the right to fight cancer but reproductive rights are political? I think Komen will lose a lot of support because of their lack of support for women's rights. This is both irinic and sad.
Comment: #1
Posted by: margaret kocevar
Wed Feb 1, 2012 3:32 PM
I have never been a big fan of Komen, feeling they spend more money & energy on self-promotion than on actual research or screenings. I have a friend who is a bilateral breast cancer survivor & she has enlightened me on a lot. She hates what she calls "pink October" & I have come to feel the same. However, if there is no other way to fund screenings & treatment for the women who were helped by Komen, then shame on them even more. For the record, I am not a proponent of abortion, either, but do recognize that Planned Parenthood does much more than that.
Comment: #2
Posted by: R. Taylor
Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:00 PM
It is confounding that concerns for women's health stops dead at the door of donor dollars. Kudos to Connie Schultz for jumping on these folks. race for the Cure. pouf. Gone. 65893
Comment: #3
Posted by: Alice Bach
Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:04 PM
Komen cannot convince me that their decision to defund Planned Parenthood was not political. I refuse to support any organization that does not trust women to make their own decisions about their bodies and their reproductive health. Any donation I would have made to Komen will now be diverted to PP.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Loretta Geyer
Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:30 PM
My mother died from many different cancers (breast, stomach, esophagas and finally liver.)

Komen will no longer receive my charitable dollars. PP here they come.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Deb
Wed Feb 1, 2012 4:55 PM
POOF all money to KOMEN GONE
POOF all money to CATHOLIC CHARITIES GONE
Comment: #6
Posted by: julia dietz
Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:12 PM
When did misogyny become the new national past time? I find it particularly appalling when self loathing female politicians chooses to join in the fun aimed at destroying women's reproductive health care. As a member of the "Our Bodies Ourselves" generation I truly believed this kind of oppression of women in general & poor women in particular to be the stuff a Dickensian nightmare. Boy, was I wrong!! Our politicians are power mad & our charities are corrupt. (I'm proud to say I've never given a penny to Komen ...didn't trust them & I've lost 2 sisters to breast cancer.) Ladies let's take back our reproductive rights & insure health care for low income women!!
Comment: #7
Posted by: Maureen Hawks
Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:15 PM
Well, Komen has completely lost my respect. I had issues before with the Komen 3 day walk because you are required to bring in $2,000 or you can't participate. You lose your fees and are not allowed to participate. This is the final stra...w for me; I will give my money to hospitals like Fairview hospitals Moss center where I know the money will go toward helping local women who are fighting and helping fund their research programs. As far as Komen goes...poof! Gone.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Joanna Gotwald
Wed Feb 1, 2012 5:43 PM
Found my FB post on the front page of the PD this morning and stand by it -- SGK put pink on the map and gave lots of women hope and support - and now they've pulled the rug out from under Planned Parenthood, caving in to the demands of those who see only one position. I firmly believe in people's right to CHOOSE. SGK is making that more difficult, particularly for low-income women. Please -- don't they have to suffer enough in this economy?
Comment: #9
Posted by: Sandra Holmes
Thu Feb 2, 2012 8:57 AM
If pro life people are now being called "anti-choice", I reserve the right to call pro-choice people "anti-life". And what exacly deems an anti-abortion group "extreme"? Is not wanting to rip human fetuses apart limb by limb and stop their beating hearts extreme?
Comment: #10
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Thu Feb 2, 2012 9:30 AM
Thanks Connie for a well researched read.
In the early 70's during the fight to get abortion legal the reacuring reason to keep it illegal was it would allow the Devil to kill Jesus in the Second Coming. And was an Evangelical doctrine for keeping woman pregnant, barefoot, and in the kitchen. Those of course were too bizarre for the conservatives of that time so the Fundies switched to a campaign appealing to emotion and rote.
And, as we know, the first part of a sales pitch is appeal to the emotion then move to features.
Comment: #11
Posted by: keith a dewey
Thu Feb 2, 2012 11:44 AM
OK!
Comment: #12
Posted by: Susan Prendergast
Thu Feb 2, 2012 8:47 PM
I have had breast cancer and am now living with recurrent ovarian cancer. I had insurance; if i had not, i would be dead now. Shame! I can support the cancer fight through other means. Planned Parenthood will, from now on, get the money formerly marked for Komen. And I will ask all my family and friends who have walked to support Komen these last eight years to join me in this.
Comment: #13
Posted by: Teresa Wagoner
Fri Feb 3, 2012 7:34 AM
Connie, Thank you for speaking out! Komen Race for the Cure reversed their funding decision. All American women should be so proud of you and all of those who spoke up about this over the last couple of days. When we are united, we can make a difference - for the common goals that we have to allow women of every econmic station to have access to the healthcare services that we need.
Comment: #14
Posted by: Chris C.
Fri Feb 3, 2012 9:26 AM
Lots of Support out there. What we are really looking for the connection between the procedure of Abortion and breast cancer, birth control and other medical issues. This is why a Breast Cancer Foundation dedicated to eliminating breast cancer and other women's reproductive related diseases initially cut ties with Planned Parenthood. The funds and support for Abortion are so great, it not only made headline news but also Komen to reverse its decision which is based on fact in counter to Connie's article "Komen foundation caves, women pay".
Comment: #15
Posted by: BrianEarley
Fri Feb 3, 2012 10:26 AM
Lots of Support out there. What we are really looking for the connection between the procedure of Abortion and breast cancer, birth control and other medical issues. This is why a Breast Cancer Foundation dedicated to eliminating breast cancer and other women's reproductive related diseases initially cut ties with Planned Parenthood. The funds and support for Abortion are so great, it not only made headline news but also Komen to reverse its decision which is based on fact in counter to Connie's article "Komen foundation caves, women pay".
Comment: #16
Posted by: BrianEarley
Fri Feb 3, 2012 10:48 AM
Planned Parenthood is a billion dollar organization. Why are they so upset about losing 700k? There is something else going on behind the scenes here they don't want you to know.
Comment: #17
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Mon Feb 6, 2012 11:21 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Connie Schultz
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 21 May 2012
Tom Rosshirt
Tom RosshirtUpdated 19 May 2012
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 19 May 2012

10 Aug 2011 It's Your War, Too

13 Apr 2011 Here's to the Poets Who Share Our Secrets

8 Aug 2010 America's Children Are Listening