creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Suzanne Fields
Suzanne Fields
11 May 2012
The Economy Is a Moral Issue

Rick Santorum endorses Mitt Romney, the man he once described as the "worst Republican in the country to … Read More.

4 May 2012
Currency for the 21st Century

When my father arrived in America at the age of 3, he spoke two languages. Neither was English. He was a grade-… Read More.

27 Apr 2012
Obama's Middle East Policy: Too Little, Too Late

President Obama waxed eloquent at the Holocaust Museum in Washington this week, speaking of the men and women … Read More.

Romney Follows the Founding Fathers in Religious Tradition

Share Comment

What a country. In one corner, the president of the United States endorses same-sex marriage, evoking his personal evolution with the Golden Rule, "You know, treat others the way you want to be treated." In the other corner, Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican candidate for president, addresses an audience of 35,000 at the Liberty University commencement, one of the largest Christian universities in the country. He says that central to our rise to global leadership is "our Judeo-Christian" tradition." When he evokes marriage as "a relationship between one man and one woman," he receives a standing ovation.

The Founding Fathers would be pleased. They wanted the vocabulary of religious tradition to enjoy vigorous debate in the public square. They knew that the Bible was subject to different interpretations and in the Old World people went to war over those differences of opinion. The bloody massacres after the European Reformation were recent history.

So they made sure God makes no appearance in the Constitution and religion in governing was made prominent by its absence. No religious test would be required for office, and the establishment of religion by the state was prohibited. When Alexander Hamilton was asked why God is never mentioned in the Constitution, he joked, "We forgot." For a man known for his prodigious memory, he was a canny reader of human nature. When John Adams was asked to state his religious creed, he was succinct and kept it to four words: "Be just and good."

That left lots of room for political discussion where diversity of religious interpretation thrives and civic culture maintains unity. It was in this tradition that Mitt Romney gave his eloquent commencement address on Saturday: "Men and women of every faith, and good people with none at all, sincerely strive to do right and lead a purpose-driven life."

In a speech that was remarkable for never mentioning his own Mormon faith, he drew on quotations from a diverse group of inspiring thinkers who, in their own way, stressed the importance of the Judeo-Christian culture and conscience with "its vision of the goodness and possibilities of every life." He was passionate and articulate in appealing to issues that unite us: "The American culture promotes personal responsibility, the dignity of work, the value of education, the merit of service, devotion to a purpose greater than self and, at the foundation, the pre-eminence of the family."

When he appealed to moral absolutes, he cited the example of Martin Luther King.

"As a young man," he said, "with most of my life ahead of me, I decided early to give my life to eternal and absolute. Not to these little gods that are here today and gone tomorrow. But to God who is the same yesterday, today and forever."

His comportment disappointed New York Times columnist Frank Bruni, who laments that he didn't make same sex marriage a wedge issue or "fan the flames of hellfire." To the chagrin of many liberals who preferred to run against a hot-headed self-righteous, sermonizing candidate, Romney cannot be stereotyped as out of touch with mainstream secular society.

Instead when it comes to a "wedge" issue, 67 percent of Americans thought that the president announced his support for gay marriage "mostly for political reasons," a cynical rather than principled position, according of those surveyed by The New York Times and CBS News.

While critics of Mitt Romney have enjoyed making fun of him as stiff and humorless, his speech at Liberty University showed an ability to talk seriously, with humility turning his business expertise into a personal parable for service.

When he was first asked to rescue the 2002 Olympics, he was busy and says he dismissed the idea because his lack of athletic prowess failed to make it sound like a logical step. His sons went further and said there was no way they could imagine their father's photo on the front page of the sports section. But he succeeded, and it became one of his most rewarding experiences.

"Opportunities for you to serve in meaningful ways may come at inconvenient times, but that will make them all the more precious," he told the graduates. He broadened Jack Kennedy's exhortation of what you can do for your country. "It is not a matter of what we are asking of life," he said, quoting Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl, "but rather what life is asking of us."

In the tradition of our Founding Fathers, Mitt Romney understands that religious freedom opens a door that is closed to many around the world. "But whether we walk through that door, and what we do with our lives after we do, is up to us."

Write to Suzanne Fields at: sfields1000@aol.com. To find out more about Suzanne Fields and read her past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
#1 This "golden rule" attirbuted to Christ doesn't include blessing that behaviour which the Bible calls perversion that needs to be repented of.
#2 The "Founding Fathers" would not be proud. Washington himself drummed homosexuals out of his army in disagrace even when he was having trouble retaining troops.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mark
Fri May 18, 2012 3:12 PM
Once I was teaching a song to class of fifth graders, one of the lines was "Tickle the ivories" an old reference to playing piano when the keys were made of ...ivory. A girl stood up and chastised me, "How disgusting", with all the force of her 11 year old dignity. I tried to explain that at the time, the mid 19th century, they were unaware of the larger implications, and not to take it too seriously. Most of the kids could, she just could not let it go. An immaturity, an inability to see people through the lens of their time, a huge need to be righteous about something.... very sad. It was many years ago, I am sure she grew up and no longer blames people for living within the moral range of their time .Could this be so of Mark, has he grown up and gained the ability to see people within the lens of their time, or is he still operating in 11 year old mode? John Kennedy did not even mention gay marriage, was he disgusting and as as bad as Washington? Or was he of his time? Judging previous generations harshly is the province of the unimaginative. Fields is wrong, but so is Mark, because the better part of us lies somewhere in between damning others and adjusting gracefully to our times. Both are spending way too much time at the former and ignoring the latter better part of human nature. Being eternally 11 is not worthy of grown ups.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Tom
Sat May 19, 2012 8:26 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Suzanne Fields
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michael Barone
Michael BaroneUpdated 21 May 2012
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 20 May 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 19 May 2012

24 Sep 2007 Not Much Ado About History

11 Jun 2007 Object of Love All Sublime

2 Oct 2009 A Revolution Too Far