creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
8 May 2012
How Romney and Our Republic Can Win (Part 2)

Last week, I showed how the Republican Party likely would lose the presidential election in November if it … Read More.

1 May 2012
How Romney and Our Republic Can Win (Part 1)

With President Barack Obama's officially starting his campaign this Saturday, many are wondering whether the … Read More.

24 Apr 2012
Soros and Obama vs. Sheriff Joe Arpaio

For many, the term "sheriff" conjures up images of the Old West. A few may consider a sheriff to … Read More.

The Feds' Intrusions Into American Farms and Families

Share Comment

With Mother's Day right at our back, I want to address one of the most extreme overreaches by the federal government into American homes that I've seen in a long time. Then I want to call on my own 91-year-old mother, who was raised in rural Oklahoma and worked in cotton fields with her family during the Great Depression, to help set straight the rural farm and child labor record.

After a national decry by American farmers (and all of us who support them), the Obama administration has just shelved its plan to severely restrict kids younger than 16 from working on family farms. But mark my words. As the feds often do, they merely are regrouping to march again on those great American homesteads.

Part of the very words of the U.S. Department of Labor's "withdrawal" statement: "The Department of Labor is announcing today the withdrawal of the proposed rule dealing with children under the age of 16 who work in agricultural vocations. ... To be clear, this regulation will not be pursued for the duration of the Obama administration."

"Will not be pursued for the duration of the Obama administration"?

So, until Jan. 20, 2013, right?

Kudos to the bipartisan group of 98 members of Congress who sent a letter to Labor Secretary Hilda Solis protesting this rule, which would have severely limited teenagers and younger children from learning the family trade, not to mention undermined the very business fabric of rural America. It might sound legislatively crazy if it weren't coming from one of the most overextended federal governments in the history of the U.S.

According to The Raleigh Telegram, "the rule would have prevented children younger than 16 from doing 'agricultural work with animals and in pesticide handling, timber operations, manure pits and storage bins' while also forbidding them from using 'power-driven equipment' and working in the 'cultivation, harvesting and curing of tobacco.'"

Can you imagine? What's next? The feds' crackdown making it illegal for kids to wash dishes, because a knife might cut them? No grinding up food, because the garbage disposer might malfunction and start suddenly while their hand is in it? No more cooking or ironing, because their hands might get burned? No more housecleaning, because the Environmental Protection Agency has designated the mixture of certain cleaning chemicals as hazardous to touch or breathe in?

Let's get real, folks! How far do the feds have to mingle in our manure before we say enough is enough? How far do we have to slide down the slippery slope of socialism before the descent becomes irreversible, before we say, "Welcome to Greece"?

As my mom, Wilma Norris Knight, told me on Mother's Day, "the federal government should keep their noses out of our business! Raising kids is the responsibility of parents, not the government.

My papa and mama would have marched from Oklahoma all the way to Washington, D.C., if they tried to tell us what to do on our farm."

This past Mother's Day weekend, many of you probably saw my mom being interviewed by Mike Huckabee, our friend the former governor of Arkansas, on his Fox News Channel show, "Huckabee." During the interview about her new autobiography, "Acts of Kindness: My Story" (available only at http://www.ChuckNorris.com), she said it best: Kids need lots of love from their own parents and the influence of their church teachers. Our children are on loan to us from God, and he nowhere alludes to the nurturing influence of a central government!

What's really at the heart of the Labor Department's farm action is the continued implementation of Agenda 21, a United Nations program launched in 1992 for the nebulous purpose of reaching global "sustainable development" but which actually promotes a European socialist system that will undermine and chip away our freedoms, liberties and rights.

At the heart of that global and social change agenda is the use of nongovernmental organizations, civil resistance movements and class warfare protests, just like the ones we've seen with Occupy's vow to shut down businesses and even Wall Street. One major Occupy website even embraces Agenda 21 as the agenda for its movement!

Of course, don't look for the term Agenda 21 to show up in President Barack Obama's re-election speeches. To the public, he will continue to pitch — as he did last week — that he is the real small-government president, even more so than former President Ronald Reagan! (I had no idea BO was running for comedian in chief.)

But what about actions like the Labor Department's farm act? Of course, that's not creating bigger government; it's just the passionate concern of the federal government to swoop down like a superhero and "protect" your children.

Just what we need during this post-Mother's Day week, the federal government's playing some further maternal or paternal role to our children, right?

The feds' actions prompt me to recall the wisdom of Reagan, who said, "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are 'I'm from the government, and I'm here to help.'"

Follow Chuck Norris through his official social media sites, on Twitter @chucknorris and Facebook's "Official Chuck Norris Page." He blogs at http://chucknorrisnews.blogspot.com. To find out more about Chuck Norris and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CHUCK NORRIS

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Typical Chuck Norris hype:
"What's really at the heart of the Labor Department's farm action is the continued implementation of Agenda 21, a United Nations program launched in 1992..."
.
From the US CDC website:
"In FY 1990, Congress directed NIOSH to develop an extensive agricultural safety and health program to address the high risks of injuries and illnesses experienced by workers and families in agriculture."
That's right Congress. In 1990. Under the the watch of President Bush, Sr.
.
Chuck Norris glibly compares reducing the risks of children working at a specific set of tasks on farms to reducing the risks associated with them doing dishes. According to the CDC, an average of 113 children and teens are killed in farming accidents each year. In 2009, 3,400 were injured. This is complex social terrain and the federal government may not be the best tool to finesse this issue, but it is not a slam dunk that the status quo is acceptable. 113 killed and 3,400 REPORTED injured is a not insignificant loss. A loss that "let's get real" Chuck does not have the integrity to acknowledge.
.
"Our children are on loan to us from God..." Did Chuck's great, great, grandma make similar arguments when the government interfered with the parent's GOD given right to send their children to work in the factory sweat shops and coal mines of the 19th century? Those little ones can sure get into coal seams where a grown-up can hardly fit, that, and they make the best chimney sweeps...
.
Kids working on the family farm is obviously not the same thing as child labor in the 19th century, but some additional regulation of the more dangerous aspects of such labor might be in order. 113 deaths from the approximately 750,000 kids who do farm work is a lot. (Note: about 230,000 of these are NOT working on Mom and Dad's family farm. They are just farm workers, placing them morally a bit closer to the 19th century example.) A thoughtful discussion would be much more enlightening than Chuck's diatribe.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mark
Mon May 14, 2012 11:46 PM
Encourage resistance as much as you can, Chuck. This is doubtless a step on the road to the kind of collectivization that didn't work in Russia and won't work in the USA, aka the USSA, United Search and Seizure of Assets. I trust that you can all set a good example of resistance in Texas.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Alan O'Reilly
Tue May 15, 2012 5:11 AM
Bush may have sought greater safety in Farming but only under Obama did the idea of outlawing farmers from having their kid work on the farm get promulgated. The whole idea is nothing but arrogance. Some city slicker looking at farm kids learning their fathers profession, learning responsibility and how to work and why to work is somehow an evil that needs to be destroyed. All because arrogant people look at the choices of others and decide they need the wisdom of the US government involved in their lives. Living is dangerous. If you want to be perfectly safe you can't do anything. Do you really think farmers don't give kids responsibility in accordance with their ability? The overreaching arrogance went too far and was stopped but a no vote only means later, a yes vote means your burdened for all time.
Why not focus on enforcing existing law. If you read about OSHA they will constantly complain they don't have enough people to effectively enforce existing laws. Who is wasting their time on writing new laws, when OSHA talks of being understaffed to effectively enforce existing rules why do they spend time creating new ones.
Soon everything will be outlawed.
C M
Comment: #3
Posted by: C Moellers
Tue May 15, 2012 6:39 AM
CM,
You are correct that giving OSHA more funding could go a long way to addressing these issues, but don't look to Chuck and his TEA party buddies to sign on to that one. They are more likely to de-fund OSHA because that's what their corporate sponsors would like. Note, however, that the proposed changes did not forbid kids working on the family farm, just limited the tasks they could perform. There may well have been overreach, but the concept of establishing rules for worker safety is not flawed. Given the death and injury rate, there may well be more that a few farmers who have miss-judged the ability of their kids.
Alan,
Collectivization? Really?
Comment: #4
Posted by: Mark
Tue May 15, 2012 7:37 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Chuck Norris
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michael Barone
Michael BaroneUpdated 21 May 2012
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 20 May 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 19 May 2012

1 Jul 2008 Oorah!

29 Jun 2010 White House vs. Boy Scouts, Part 2

27 Sep 2011 The US, the UN and Genetic Engineering